Segregation of Duties for Internal Control

Google Meet is your one app for video calling and meetings across all devices. Use video calling features like fun filters and effects or schedule time to connect when everyone can join. Google Duo and Google Meet have been combined into a new Meet app for video calling and meetings. One real-world example in the news is the scandal at Wells Fargo, a central US bank. Employees opened millions of unauthorized accounts to meet sales targets and earn bonuses. Employees responsible for opening accounts were also responsible for approving and verifying those accounts.

In addition, it can also help to improve the accuracy and reliability of financial reporting and internal controls, as well as reduce the likelihood of errors or omissions in financial records. This can help the organization to comply with regulatory requirements and industry standards and avoid legal and reputational risks. In the AUT activity, the department checks the PRF submitted by the requestor; in the REC and CUS duties, they send the PO to the supplier. In the first case, there are two different assets (PRFs and POs), so SoD is maintained. In the second case, the purchasing department is solely responsible for sending orders to suppliers.

D. Use Compensating Controls Where Full Segregation Is Not Possible

For example, one person can place an order to buy an asset, but a different person must record the transaction in the accounting records. The X-axis would list only the specific procedures (Create requisition, Authorize requisition, Create order, Authorize order). Each user role would be rated low, medium, or high risk related to performing a particular procedure. In this purchasing example, User 1, whose primary duty is requisition creation, would rate as high risk performing requisition authorization. Ideally, each user role matches one procedure in the process workflow to minimize risk.

Segregation of Duties is a fundamental control principle that involves dividing responsibilities among departments and members to prevent conflicts, errors, and risks, particularly fraud. It ensures that no single individual can control all aspects of a critical process, upholding transparency and reducing the opportunity for any form of misconduct. If two or more activities are performed by the same actor on the same assets with the same duties, those steps can be collapsed into a single evaluation (in a single row of the matrix separation of duties in step 4). This helps to promote accountability, transparency, and ethical behavior within the organization. When looking to understand how to apply a SOD matrix to a business process, it’s helpful to use an example. Let’s say we want to examine a purchasing workflow for potential role and duty conflicts.

Implement access controls and monitoring tools.

This can be done by creating a table of all the activities performed and the processes or subprocesses to which they belong. Ideally, the level of detail in this table should be tailored to meet the needs of step 3, which classifies all activities with an SoD perspective. Separating duties aims to promote a culture of trust, integrity, and accountability and protect the organization and its stakeholders from the negative consequences of financial misconduct. To ensure the effectiveness of Segregation of Duties, organizations should follow best practices in its design, implementation, and monitoring. SoD framework and requirements should also change to keep them effective through organizational changes and evolutions in the business landscape.

Examples

Traditionally, SOD matrices were created by hand, but modern organizations use software tools to automatically create spreadsheets that are useful for tracking workflow duties and identifying role conflicts. Many organizations develop individual SOD matrices for each critical business process within their workflow. Segregation of duties is recommended across the enterprise, but it’s arguably most critical in accounting, cybersecurity, and information technology departments. Significant damage to your organization can result from errors or fraud in all three departments, and organizations failing to implement effective SOD policies in these areas do so at their peril. It is not necessary to describe all the activities and loops in the subprocess as long as no new duty is highlighted. For example, in figure 1, both “Draft, share and update purchasing plans” and “Submit plans to board” are REC duties performed by the same actor, on the same asset.

Problems with the Separation of Duties

Many organizations create a visual representation of processes, helping map activities and duties to roles within their workflow. Role engineering, which defines position access rights and responsibilities and enterprise resource planning (ERP), can help clarify business roles and duties. SOD is a fundamental internal accounting control prohibiting single entities from possessing unchecked power to conceal financial errors or misappropriate assets in their specific role. SOD controls require a thorough analysis of all accounting roles with the segregation of all duties deemed incompatible. For example, someone responsible for inventory custody can’t also oversee transactional recordkeeping regarding inventory. Segregation of Duties can be applied in various organizational processes, including financial transactions, procurement, payroll, and IT systems, to enhance internal controls and reduce risks.

separation of duties

A. Definition of Segregation of Duties

separation of duties

Software solutions with Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) help manage permissions dynamically, particularly when people’s job descriptions change. While dividing labor among workers seems simple, translating it into enforceable policies is more complex. The following structured guide can help companies carefully segregate duties without too many workflow disruptions. Is a senior consultant and trainer in the information and communications technology services and solutions business unit at Beta 80 Group. He concentrates on the telecommunications and finance industries, and his areas of expertise include business continuity, IT governance and compliance, information security and service management.

Step 1: Choose a Google Account type

Segregation of Duties (SoD) is a key internal control mechanism that reduces the risk of errors and fraud by ensuring that no single individual has control over all aspects of any critical financial transaction. By dividing responsibilities among different employees, SoD creates checks and balances that make it more difficult for errors or irregularities to go undetected. This principle is crucial in financial reporting, operational processes, and compliance with regulatory requirements. The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) identifies SoD as a critical component of effective control activities within an internal control framework.

A segregation of duties matrix visually represents the job roles and specific tasks of the people involved in a critical process. Discover the significance of SoD in Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC), its benefits, examples, and implementation steps for enhanced risk management and compliance. Segregation of duties (SoD) is a central issue for security and governance. A problem with the separation of duties is that it is much less efficient and more time-consuming than having a single person be responsible for all aspects of a transaction.